Is SARS really so extremely dangerous?


Or as it K++ formulates in his email to me from some weeks ago:

I may be a pain in the ass, but here in Holland i see "SARS" being a number one news in BBC News, so i feel obliged to  share these views, different from what you can see on TV, with my friends...

please note the role of the hospitals in the last part of the article....

(sorry about any inconvinience)

k++

_______________________________________________________________________


Following text is the clipping from JON RAPPOPORT http://www.nomorefakenews.com/
theChallenge does not shares nor denies the information published in this rapport.

_______________________________________________________________________


Climate of fear and suspicion

April 27.  Reuters reports that in Taiwan, the government is handing out cash rewards to anyone who turns in a suspected SARS case.  $72 per squeal.

A Taiwanese Department of Health official said, "People who suspect their family members, close friends, or neighbors may be infected with SARS can report them to local health authorities."

Talk about creating a climate of fear and suspicion.  And they don't need to use political ideology as the "crime."  They can sit back and say it's just the virus and they are protecting everyone.

Meanwhile, on the mainland, the Chinese government appears to be shutting down the whole city of Beijing and sealing it off.  Exit from, and entrance to, Beijing is severely limited.  

Another vital point on how this SARS scam works, at least in the West: we are conditioned to receive sanitized news when it comes to the subject of ongoing death from disease.

We don't hear about, and we don't see, in the streets, people dying from disease on a regular basis.

THEREFORE, WHEN WE GET SUDDEN REPORTS OF DEATHS PILING UP IN ASIA, WE AUTOMATICALLY ASSUME IT MEANS NEW DEATHS FROM NEW CAUSES.

This is completely ridiculous.

In fact, people all over the world die every day from illnesses (and from medical treatment).

I have been quoting statistics in the last few days on pneumonia and influenza, stats that prove how many people, worldwide, die of these conditions---all the time.  Millions per year.

These pneumonias and flu illnesses are indistinguishable from SARS.

So don't be roped in by this one.

I could have gone to China in 1997 and documented all sorts of deaths from flu and pneumonia.  With enough money and enough PR backup, I could have announced a plague roaring out of China.  And people would have believed it.

There is no joy in death, but there is less joy when death is re-framed and re-packaged to cripple economies and terrify populations and bring on 1984-type political clamp-downs. 


When AIDS came down the pipeline with all its false science, I decided to see whether its number one symptom, pneumocystis pneumonia, was really a rare disease only seen in people who were diagnosed HIV positive. I got no help from the CDC, because that august organization did not keep stats on pneumocystis cases in which people were HIV negative.

That's called a clue.

But I found descriptions of outbreaks of pneumocystis in orphanages in Eastern Europe and Vietnam. HIV had nothing to do with that. Starvation, abandonment, dirty water, fear---those were the causes.

Now, with SARS, we are seeing the same thing. SARS is supposed to be a pneumonia in Asia. So why aren't we seeing stats on regular run-of-the-mill pneumonia cases from that region of the world? Forget the so-called SARS pneumonia. What about the regular types?

Well, I did a little digging. From the Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics, we get this report: 3,087 deaths from pneumonia in Hong Kong in the year 1996. Way before SARS.

And if there were that many deaths, who knows how many non-fatal cases there were? 20,000? 40,000? 100,000?

Quite a bit more devastating than what is now being laid at the door of the SARS pneumonia there.

So why wasn't there a gigantic outcry among public health officials all over the world in 1996? After all, conventional doctors consider pneumonia to be contagious. Why didn't airlines go down into oblivion in '96?

I'll tell you why. Because, unlike the situation in 1996, SARS is being hyped to the gills by medical PR people, and by virus hunters who now have a chokehold on all "new-disease" research.

Of course, people will say the 2003 outbreak of pneumonia in Hong Kong is different, because it is being caused by a new virus, the coronavirus. But that science is as foul as 1000 truckloads of eggs rotting in the sun. So far, we have no proof the researchers have even isolated this coronavirus. And in Canada, they are claiming that the virus has been found in less than 50 percent of diagnosed SARS patients. And in patients where they say they have found the virus, it is in such tiny amounts that no one can figure out why it would even cause a cold.

So we are thrown back on the general description of the SARS illness, which, in Asia, is just pneumonia.

As I say, in 1996, just pneumonia killed 3,087 people in Hong Kong. Therefore, what is happening there now is nothing new.

WHO stats for 1997---also before the coronavirus was "discovered" or "existed"---show that, worldwide, in developing countries, there were 2,000,000 cases of diseases of the respiratory system.

In developed countries? 960,000 cases.

And, yes, going by the list of vague SARS symptoms, ALL of these cases could be called SARS.

Getting the picture?

If you claim you have found a new virus, you can then re-shuffle existing disease cases and put some of them under a brand new label. In this situation, the label is SARS.

I'm looking at another pneumonia report. This one is from the Iloilo province of the Philippines. One province. In 2001, pneumonia caused 1,990 deaths there. So how many overall cases were there? 10,000? 30,000? All of them could be called SARS.

It turns out that, according to conventional medical science, pneumonia can be caused by about 30 different germs. Viruses, bacteria, fungi, mycoplasmas. So how come, when SARS was "discovered," the researchers immediately went to work looking for a virus? I'll tell you why, one more time. THE VIRUS HUNTERS HAVE A CHOKEHOLD ON THE RESEARCH. It's as simple and non-scientific and absurd as that.

And when you cut below the surface of all this germ nonsense, you discover that pneumonia is brought about by the weakening of the immune system. That weakening can be caused in scores of different ways. Globally, you would be looking at chronic malnutrition and dirty water as the top reasons.

Here is another thing I found out when I investigated pneumocystis pneumonia in 1987. The germ that is blamed for this illness lives in the lungs of perhaps 80 percent of EVERYBODY on the planet. All the time. It does NOTHING. Unless the immune system begins to wobble and crack. In which case, you might get peumocycstis, you might get cholera, you might get TB, you might get influenza, and so on. Who cares what the disease name is? The root cause is the same.

Fraud, fraud, and more fraud. The train is moving down the tracks.

"Look, we've got millions of cases of lung disease all over the world. We call them this and we call them that. If we can just siphon off some of those cases and call them SARS, we're in business with a new disease. So we'll have to tie these siphoned-off cases to a virus. A virus we've never seen before. That's easy. There are millions of viruses we've never seen. If we just say we've got a new virus, and it is in the bodies of SOME of these 'new' cases, nobody will notice the crazy science. We can pull it off with enough PR."

Frank Plummer, the head of a key WHO lab in Canada, should be called The Incredible Shrinking Frank. First he said they had found the coronavirus in 60 percent of diagnosed SARS cases. That was already a scandal. Only 60 percent? Then he revised that figure downward to 50 percent. Now he's saying it's 40 percent.

And in Asia? No one is saying what percentage of SARS cases there show any evidence at all of this coronavirus.

If we push these WHO/CDC maniacs far enough into the Truth, they might wind up saying they've discovered lung disease, which has been around on the planet for the last 500000000000000000000000000 years.

And they might also finally confess they never really did find a coronavirus at all. In anyone. They just found genetic fragments which might have been from some virus. Maybe. Could be. Don't know. Hope so.

In other words, these WHO/CDC honchos were the little boys who cried wolf, and the travel industry collapsed, and people died who didn't have to die, because if a real doctor had really looked at a single patient, he might have found out what was causing, IN THAT PATIENT, a lung infection.

JON RAPPOPORT http://www.nomorefakenews.com